Introduction

As health technology improves, guidelines must keep up with new developments. Two concerns to note are standards for neurotechnology and the digital health field. Neurotechnology gives a better grasp of the brain and the nervous system. Its emergence has the potential to change patients’ access to care. Yet, delegates need to balance progress while shielding human rights. This also applies to digital health strategies. While they have the chance to reach groups in far places, there is the concern of equitable access. Delegates should draw upon UNESCO’s current global standards to find gaps challenged by new health tools.

Ethical Standards for Neurotechnology

Neurotechnology is developing fast. One fast-growing type is brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). BCIs act as brain stimulants, and their growing use raises challenges. As neural data becomes seen as personal, new policies are introduced. However, neurotechnology could move faster than laws that protect privacy, autonomy, and human rights. For example, BCIs could influence or track someone’s thoughts. With AI algorithms, BCIs can analyze patterns in brain signals that were once too complex for humans to interpret. AI models can potentially infer thoughts, intentions, or emotional states, even if someone did not intentionally share them. UNESCO calls this a risk to mental privacy and highlights how neurotechnology could reveal personal information. This could pose a risk to human dignity and autonomy.

There have been multiple recent and active policy responses to neurotechnology risks on both national and international levels. In the US, lawmakers have been pushing for stronger protections. In September 2025, US lawmakers proposed the MIND Act, which would direct federal agencies like the Federal Trade Commission to study neurotechnology risks and recommend standards for protecting neural data and consumer privacy. At the same time, the Council of Europe released draft guidelines that are meant to adapt Europe’s strong personal data laws specifically to neuroscience and AI‑enhanced brain data. This is essential as neurotechnologies advance. The speed at which political action has moved in the last months reflects that adaptation is urgent. Thus, international organizations and national governments are introducing new rules.

A major global policy was introduced by UNESCO on November 5, 2025. It adopted the first recommendation on the ethics of neurotechnology. This is the most complete international policy on neural data so far. The UNESCO standards define “neural data” as a distinct, highly sensitive category of information. It also includes over 100 detailed recommendations covering rights‑based concerns and hypothetical future risks, such as misuse for commercial manipulation during sleep. Overall, it aims to protect mental privacy, freedom of thought, and informed consent. The document asks member states to make new laws based on the ethical norms listed. The recommendation also highlights that immediate action is key, and countries should approve policies that protect the people.

This policy also warns about the risks for younger people. Since children’s brains are still developing, it is not wise to expose them to these technologies. It also points out the importance of international cooperation and constant monitoring of new technologies. UNESCO’s global framework pushes the development of neurotechnology in a safer direction. Currently, the neurotechnology space can feel like the “wild west” without strong safeguards. The new UNESCO standards aim to inform people so they can genuinely consent before using neurotech devices.

The Potential for Digital Health Strategies

UNESCO often partners with other countries to set up standards. By pooling resources, expertise, and knowledge, member states can address shared priorities more effectively. Once standards are set, other agencies and organizations help implement them across sectors such as health, education, and digital governance, ensuring that global guidelines translate into real-world impact.

Recent global digital-health strategies are set by the World Health Organization (WHO). They are enforced in countries in need. In the Republic of Georgia, rural areas struggle to access medical care. People travel far to hospitals with a shortage of workers. To address this, the European Union (EU) is funding a three-year telehealth project in the country, implemented by UN agencies such as the WHO, UNICEF, UN Population Fund, and UN Office for Project Services. The project equips 50-60 rural primary care clinics with modern digital tools, including telemedicine platforms, video consultation systems, and connected devices for monitoring child growth and development. Through this initiative, rural doctors can consult specialists remotely, provide expert guidance, and track patients’ health more efficiently. Families also participate in online group sessions with doctors, nutritionists, and psychologists, reducing the need to travel long distances while improving access to high-quality healthcare and early interventions.

Digital health tools can improve both health and education. UNESCO has helped Tanzania improve access to online health classes for college students. They work with the National Council for Technical and Vocational Education and Training (NACTVET) to offer classes on how to make informed choices about students’ health. Other classes through UNESCO’s O3 Plus project have reached 26 higher education institutions and 150,000 learners across Tanzania and Zanzibar, increasing access to rights-based health information by over 60 percent. It also strengthens youth-friendly health services on campuses, improves privacy and confidentiality, and promotes gender-based violence prevention.

Many digital health strategies increase vital care to underserved areas. Countries like Georgia and Tanzania are often less connected to global health networks, but partnerships and science diplomacy can promote knowledge sharing, build trust, and strengthen health systems.

Conclusion

As delegates address this key topic, they should keep in mind UNESCO’s mandate to sustain human rights and progress in science. It supports both moral standards for neurotechnology and improvements in digital health. Two main examples are UNESCO’s Recommendation on Ethics of Neurotechnology and multilateral collaboration in developing countries. To strengthen ethical standards, delegates are urged to stay informed on the growth of these ever-changing issues.

Bibliography

1. Aisha Down, “UNESCO Adopts Global Standards on ‘Wild West’ Field of Neurotechnology,” The Guardian, November 6, 2025, www.theguardian.com/world/2025/nov/06/unesco-adopts-global-standards-on-wild-west-field-of-neurotechnology.
2. Council of Europe, Draft Guidelines on Data Protection in the Context of Neurosciences, T‑PD(2025)1rev1 (Strasbourg: Consultative Committee of the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with Regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (Convention 108), 2 September 2025), rm.coe.int/t-pd-2025-1-draft-guidelines-neuroscience-after-plenary-2025-september/4880287a0c.
3. IEEE Brain, “Neurotechnologies: The Next Technology Frontier,” IEEE Brain, Accessed December 1, 2025, brain.ieee.org/topics/neurotechnologies-the-next-technology-frontier/.
4. OECD, “Technology convergence, trends, prospects and policies,” OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2025, October 28, 2025, www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook-2025_5fe57b90-en/full-report/technology-convergence-trends-prospects-and-policies_5902a07e.html.
5. UNESCO, “Empowering the generation of healthy and skilled young people,” October 25, 2025, www.unesco.org/en/articles/empowering-generation-healthy-and-skilled-young-people.
6. UNESCO, “From Global to Regional: Advancing Science Diplomacy” December 5, 2025,  www.unesco.org/en/articles/global-regional-advancing-science-diplomacy.
7. UNESCO, “Ethics of Neurotechnology: UNESCO adopts the first global standard in the cutting-edge technology,” November 5, 2025, www.unesco.org/en/articles/ethics-neurotechnology-unesco-adopts-first-global-standard-cutting-edge-technology.
8. UNICEF, “EU and UNICEF support telemedicine to help families and doctors monitor children’s development” September 4, 2025, www.unicef.org/georgia/stories/eu-and-unicef-support-telemedicine-help-families-and-doctors-monitor-childrens-development.
9. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Ethics of Neurotechnology, UNESCO, 2025, www.unesco.org/en/ethics‑neurotech.\
10. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, “Our Rights, Our Lives, Our Future Plus (O3 Plus) Project in Tanzania,” UNESCO (last updated December 19, 2025), www.unesco.org/en/articles/our-rights-our-lives-our-future-plus-o3-plus-project-tanzania
11. World Health Organization, “Turning telemedicine into a core health-care service in Georgia” October 1, 2025, www.who.int/europe/news/item/01-10-2025-turning-telemedicine-into-a-core-health-care-service-in-georgia.